thanks pal we are trying to bring pal back at work it seems to have gone anyway im now waiting for better sale best I could now was 2014 XTR silver 3000 ks ex demo 46000 thought I could get better but he wouldn't move so I didn't by it .@Bluey sorry I just remembered you asked about my BT a few days ago mate. Click on the link in my signature for what I have done.
We are rapt with it having done lots of trips big and small. Its already 2 years next month since delivery, mine is a manual too.
I was looking at a Ranger or BT50 to lease for when I commuting to work when the family moves out of town. The only one I can lease is a Ranger Wildtrak Auto as it the only Dual Cab I like that can't carry a tonne or more in the tray...
Personally I like the Ranger better due to looks, but I also like the features and dash layout of the BT50.
Welcome to the GT clubWell BT50 GT ordered..... Its look is growing on me, my heart said ford but the head and wallet said BT. I just couldnt justify they extra 6k and the BT is coming with more extras fitted as well so the end would have been around 7 to 8 k. Mazda has some cracking deals at the moment which i just couldn't refuse.
Well BT50 GT ordered..... Its look is growing on me, my heart said ford but the head and wallet said BT. I just couldnt justify the extra 6k and the BT is coming with more extras fitted as well so the end would have been around 7 to 8 k. Mazda has some cracking deals at the moment which i just couldn't refuse.
Most sensible assessment I've heard yet.They come off the same production line, so any issues with one will be apparent in the other,
I've got a Ranger, one of my mates just bought one too but was offered a really great deal on a Mazda
and I told him he was a fool for not taking it.
Suspension is the same on both now, IMO Mazda dash is nicer and Ranger front is nicer.
As for reverse cameras carvision in Melb do a kit that looks factory for about $450 with 2 cameras (one for the back of my van).
Which ever one anyone buys they should be happy. Enjoy your GT.
your right about not being as close as everyone thinks. auto tranny mechanic told me the fords have a deeper oil sump and longer filter pick up to reach the bottom than the mazda witch equals more oil in the box, barney.I think you will find on this forum the BT50's have been more reliable than their counterparts (go down the list in tow cars and have a read). I have a BT 50 and love it. Both models are due for an upgrade in 2015 and the Mazda is set to get a more conventional front and I think the Ford may get the Everest front which looks like an old Kluger:disgust:. We are due to upgrade soon and every time I go to a Ford dealer, their pricing kills it for me. By the way, they are not as close as people think, yes there are lots of common components but also a lot of differences. I might look at the Colorado but will probably stick with Mazda.
Most sensible assessment I've heard yet.
Agree @relgate and @BaxnRach either would make you pretty damn happy.
And yes @macca you are 100% correct on the spare parts front. Ford and Mazda have "model shared" for years. I have worked in the automotive spares game for years, selling both genuine and aftermarket parts. There were plenty of occasions where the OEM Ford part came in a Mazda box and vice versa. Also times when both brands sold the identical part under their unique brand. And it wasn't uncommon to have significant price variance for what was essentially the same part, just in a different box.
well cruza driver put 500 on a bt auto today to hold it for me its at greame powell mazda under ex demo ones its gold colourThen you'll be in the Ute Club to @Bluey :rockon:
deals not done yet but its getting close thanks for support I need all I can getGood stuff @Bluey can`t wait to see it hoto:.
well cruza driver put 500 on a bt auto today to hold it for me