Hi @Boots in Action,
I had a quick look at the regulator. A platinum one that looks similar can be picked up for less than $35. They also weigh only 142g. This seems way too cheap and too light to be a 10A MPPT controller. A 10A MPPT controller will need to have a reasonably sized transformer / coil inside to do the voltage conversion and this makes them larger and heavier than a PWM.
What leads you to believe it is a real MPPT controller and not yet another one from the family of PWM controllers? The front label says nothing about it being an MPPT controller.
The panel specification is Vmp of 18V and Imp of 11.12A. So in good sunlight at 25C one would expect 200W into an MPPT controller. With a load or a low SOC battery, and assuming 97% efficiency, as in the ad, one should expect 194W into a battery at around 14.4V = 13.47A. This would exceed the 10A rating of the controller.
But, for $150 for a 200W portable panel, 5m lead, and an anderson plug it still seems good value even with a PWM regulator.
At around 10A, I would suggest mounting the regulator close to the battery and ensure adequately sized leads between the panel and the controller to minimise the voltage drop.
cheers
Mike
Hi Mike @mikerezny and @Bellbirdweb and @Crusty181, and @G Daddy, have a look at this site NOT for its value at being a supposed MPPT controller at that price. But the diagram of the suggested connections of panels, battery and LOAD. And in the description, it states that the unit will disconnect that load if voltage is low and reconnect load when voltage has returned to "normal" level. Reading on, it appears that the settings are fixed (not user adjustable) but the protection is there. For that to work, the LOAD must go through the controller and internal connection would have to be in series with the load line. I believe that ALL solar controllers have some sort of LVD and LVR and this valuable feature is not used by most. It would only be useful if the LVD was HIGHER than the SETEC (how low can you go!!) or even the setting/s on your Waeco compressor fridges. It would in effect double the protection of the battery by disconnecting the load earlier. No more stuffed batteries when voltage dropped into the non re-coverable zone. Better to disconnect at 11.8 volts? than at 10.00 or 10.8 volts!!. This method is the way I have in my own electrical system and in my Daughter's van too. Worth following up and doing an article on it again.
Whilst at Caloundra a few weeks ago, I had a long conversation with a fellow camper. He was a very experienced "sparkie" and also worked with solar. I brought up the subject of placing the van load through the solar controller instead of straight off the Setec distribution connections (and relying on the very poor LVD of the Setec), and he concurred with me that as the two LVD's and LVRs switching were in fact in parallel, the highest LVD control would work first and disconnect load according to the setting on the solar controller. I have noticed however that the SETEC power supply (a relay of some sort??) also disconnects when the solar controller reached LVD. Of course any other loads connected directly across the battery terminals and not through the SETEC system would continue to draw current until the batteries were stuffed. Comments please.
/www.ebay.com.au/itm/100A-MPPT-Solar-Panel-Regulator-Charge-Controller-12V-24V-Auto-Focus-Tracking-BU/292703818611?hash=item442681d373:m:mQhk7V