Hi team,
Just want to be sure that these posts are actually in response to my questions, me being
@Joves, not
@Clewsy?! If not, it’ll make for a pretty funny/disastrous scenario... me taking your advice, meant for a completely unrelated topic, and burning myself to cinders!!
Seriously though, I do really appreciate everyone’s input and believe that it is all valid. If I thought I knew as much as you guys do, I wouldn’t ask the question in the first place.
@Boots in Action, I’m actually really keen to pursue your idea of two separate Anderson’s... one effectively being a solar input and the other being an output/connection to add the auxiliary battery in parallel with the house batteries. I reckon, in theory, its an ingenious idea. I think it is important to note that I am not looking for a solution that gets me the absolute best theoretical outcome possible, drawing the absolute most ah out of each battery and taking in every last watt of solar. I’m looking for an option for the occasional boost to power capability, for the odd occasion that I’m freecamping and feeling as though the current house setup might fall slightly short. If there is a way that I can get an extra day or so out of the venture by utilising the equipment I already have, then that is absolutely fine by me. I don’t really care if its not wired up in the most efficient way possible (note “efficient”, I do want it to be safe). If it buys me more powered time, then goal achieved. Your solution seems to fit that bill very nicely and, for that, I thank you.
@Drover, throughout my limited time on this forum, you’ve been a great help (I’m
@Joves btw, not
@Clewsy.. haha) and have always seemed to be a great voice of reason. Your input to this question has made a lot of sense and is also massively appreciated. I’ll always appreciate someone giving it to me straight and telling me “in my opinion, it’s not worth it!” My current setup may prove this to be true, which I will get into further in a bit. The main reason I’ve gone down the path of purchasing the aux battery is to power the secondary drinks fridge. The reason I’ve purchased the 300 watt solar panel is to power the aux battery. It then struck me that and extra 105ah of battery and 300 watt of portable solar seems a bit of a luxury for a plain old drinks fridge, so I wondered if there might be a way that I could ALSO utilise them both to supplement the main van’s power supply when freecamping and running only on 12 volt. The aux battery being used separately wont power my van lights or TV etc. if not connected to the actual van. This is what i’m Hoping to achieve. It seems as though there is a way, albeit perhaps not the most efficient way, which sounds great to me. I do completely take on board that the reward may not be worth the effort though. I’d have imagined that having an Anderson plug fitted to connect to a portable 300 watt solar panel, for when the van is parked in the shade and the roof panels are all but useless, would be a no-brainer though, wouldn’t it?!
@mikerezny, you clearly know your stuff, so I appreciate you coming in with advice also. It sounded more to me like you were providing advice on how to go about doing it safely, not that it was a terrible idea altogether?
Anyhow, now back onto the important parts of the topic, the practical application of what is either a genius or imbecile idea. It looks as though it might not be practical after all. Not due to the possibilities of it all, but due to my current setup. Taking a closer look at my power setup today, it appears that Jayco have installed Gel batteries, rather than AGM, as specified at the time of purchase. This is actually pretty frustrating, as it seems that this will knock the plan on the plan on the head before it has even gotten off the ground (my auxiliary battery is an AGM). I purchased the AGM auxiliary battery of similar capacity for this very reason, but stupidly did not check to make sure that Jayco had installed AGM batteries in the van, as purchased. This, i assume, makes my van batteries and auxiliary battery non-compatible for connecting in parallel, so that pretty well rules out the second Anderson connection for the time being. As for the first, to add portable solar supply to the existing roof panels, this may not be viable either. I took a good look at the setup and specs for what has been installed and I have the BMPro3 J35c. This is only rated to 28amps/450 total watts of solar input. Plus, it seems too good a system to be ripping out of a new van and replacing with an MPPT controller for this type of “once in awhile” venture.
So, it appears I have an auxiliary battery that is non-compatible to link in parallel with my van batteries (due to Jayco supplying me with different type batteries than i actually purchased) and a controller that isn’t up to the task of an additional 300 watt portable solar panel.
I guess now my main real question is if the rating of the BMPro3 should stop me from occasionally adding the extra 30 watt solar panel at all, or should I just not expect to get the full benefit from it? I thought the whole point of the controller was purely to limit the flow into the batteries. Would having a theoretical 620 watts of solar panels (even though we all know they’re unlikely to be putting out the amount of power/wattage they state even under perfect conditions at the same time) connected to a controller rated for 450 watts, actually pose a real issue? If so, I think there is still a real case for being able to add the portable panel when the rooftop panels are parked up under full shade. Am I right in assuming that, when parked in full shade, the rooftop panels will likely be putting out a low enough wattage that the 300 watt portable panel could comfortably be used to supplement?
Again, thanks to ALL for your replies.
Joves