I wonder when they will be available and at what cost. Great article and example of how power is lost/regained.Here's a link to Maxium new technology article
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=...t=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&ei=6xeAWao-6tzzB8DGs9AJ
And below a clip from the article
View attachment 56231
Hi @mikerezny , now look what we have started!! When all this is sorted out, we will all be "arm chair" experts. Still to check on diode type/s in my panels. Just as well you have checked what happens when your panel is shaded. Important if off grid for a while longer than you are now.Hi,
I just pulled the cover off the terminal block of my 40W solar panel. There are no diodes.
Also did some testing of my panel in the shade. The panel has one string of series cells. If I completely block out any one cell, the output of the entire panel goes to zero. Partially blocking out many cells just reduces the output.
cheers
Mike
Another great video on solar production. I had viewed this one before I did my testing. That is why my panels were NOT moved at all during testing. Because it was all done in about 20 minutes, there would not be too much change on sun direction. I could not guarantee consistent results if any panel was moved at all, as little possibility of getting same angle of panel to sun.Article on panel angle
My heads starting too spin now.............................................
I thought I knew a bit about solar before reading some of this info.
Really interesting stuff on the series vs parallel, and cell shading.
I think I'll invest in a MPPT controller and keep them in parallel due to the high chance of shading on the roof mounted panels.
I love it. Also being a tech I love playing with the stuff.Hello @Bellbirdweb , you are not the only one who thought they knew a bit about Solar panels and charging. I was just interested in experimenting to see if improvements could be made in charging with an MPPT controller, instead of buying another battery to extend time off the grid. This is mainly what I do for up to a week or longer. As @Drover said "nothing like testing in real conditions instead of semi controlled in videos". Look what has happened! The solar thread has gone ballistic!! I was only the guinea pig with limited info. @mikerezny was the one that provided the "in depth" knowledge to properly interpret and analyse the raw data I was able to supply. @G Daddy was in there too. I believe nothing but good information and greater knowledge that will benefit all those interested in solar can come out of this thread. Thanks to everyone who followed this thread and for the interest and enthusiasm they have contributed. God bless.
I love it. Also being a tech I love playing with the stuff.
I've been playing with DC stuff since I was a kid, and work in computing and communications still.
I thought solar was pretty straight forward, so all of the info has been fantastic, keep it up.
Hi @Drover,It's really a big pain as I have pulled my whole system down and put it back together, mostly upgrading the cabling and connections..............not pedantic enough to run a big test to see though................though after looking at your test it does pique my interest in seeing how my system fares but one on the roof and one on the ground wouldn't have the same picture quality as your solar farm @Boots in Action
Hello again @G Daddy , you seem to be able to interpret all the data pretty well and have no doubt noticed some of the anomalies that have come up. I rechecked ALL the data for the Wednesday test (as listed on original chart- amended!) with the readings for the Monday test which I have not shown. However, the figures are basically the same with the same anomalies as in Wednesday's test. So that rules out any error in transfer data!! In hindsight, I should have shown the Vpm (voltage power maximum) for each panel as that may be one of the reasons of incompatibility of panel outputs. "A" rated at 80 watts is 17.6 volts Vmp and when multiplied by max power current (Ipm) 4.55A comes to 80.0 watts - correct. "B" rated at 180 watts, 18.0 volts by 10.01 comes to 180 watts - correct. "C" panel rated at 200 watts, 18.3 volts by 10.92A comes to 199.83 watts - close enough!!! Could it be that the different Vpm for each panel has a bearing on connected panel outputs?? I did do a check on panel output voltages whilst they were under load, but I do not remember any major differences - perhaps 17 volts for "A", and 18 volts for both "B" and "C". Yet this is not shown at PV figures in chart. See figures in chart which were taken from MPPT screen while testing which did not come anywhere near 36 volts except "A" plus "B" series test. Looks like more testing required to solve this!!
Any ideas on "Why is it so"??? @mikerezny , can you provide some input on this also??
Hi @G Daddy,Hi @Boots in Action Re panel spec, can you supply the IV curves for these panels, it seems the 200W panel is very inefficient.
View attachment 56279
Thanks for the chart @G Daddy , I believe you are correct in saying that the supposed 200 watt panel is not as efficient as the others. The surface area of the 200 watt panel is less than the 180 watt for a start, although the solar cells are supposed to be the latest in technology - advertising speak. Yes, I noticed the variation and was not impressed. Bought on Ebay for $195.00, the same people I bought from for the 180 watt panel more than 2 years ago for $279.00. Looks like I have not got what I thought although I think it said efficiency was 16.8% the same as most of the others at that time. Going to have a look at diodes tomorrow and see if they need to be upgraded to Schotky type. I checked with supplier when I first received it and they assured me it was capable of producing 10 A at peak light. I do not have the IV curves unfortunately, but I will follow up with supplier to see what they can provide for me. The other possibility could be the angle I had the panels placed. Perhaps they were not in the optimum position as the others as I did not have a protractor or similar with me. One variation I did not take into consideration in testing. I will be able to do more testing on this panel shortly and will let you know the outcome.Hi @Boots in Action Re panel spec, can you supply the IV curves for these panels, it seems the 200W panel is very inefficient.
View attachment 56279
Hi @G Daddy,
great job on the spreadsheet. I agree with you but also go as far as to say both the 180W (67%) AND 200W (55%) panels seem to be inefficient compared to the 80W panel (96%).
Hi @Boots in Action, did you manage to measure the solar input current when you did the measurements for each panel?
Something does not seem quite correct with the results of the individual tests.
cheers
Mike
Hi @G Daddy,HI @Boots in Action Did they supply a chart similar to this or can you supply.
View attachment 56281
View attachment 56280
Thanks @G Daddy , I try to walk away from this and your chart starts to lure me back and enticing me to do a run on my panels, I don't want to but feel myself getting sucked into this..................................you and flamin @Boots in Action are piqueing my interest into something that I really don't want to know, as if it's not up to speed I will want to spend $$$ rectifying it.........