I wonder how much Ford will hand over?
If I was in the market for that style of vehicle, I'd be looking at the Ranger over the Hilux anyway.
That's coz the rangers are cheap, and after having mine, ya get what ya pay for. If I get another dual cab, I'm pushing for a hilux.The mines must buy a stack of Hilux's. I see they are top selling in their segment but I don't know too many people buying them anymore. All my tradey mates are buying Rangers, Bt50's and Amaroks. I'm sure I will get a bite:fish2:. Seriously I think there are more Rangers and BT50's on the road.
That's coz the rangers are cheap, and after having mine, ya get what ya pay for. If I get another dual cab, I'm pushing for a hilux.
I know there are Toyota lovers just as there are Ford, Holden, Nissan etc, etc, but just looking at the specs and features of the Hilux I just can't fathom why anyone would buy one in the private market these days (commercial I can kinda understand)
Lacks power, torque, fuel economy, towing ability and payload.
It's also more expensive.
And Ford know this, hence the promotion
And that part is Toyota's advantage, the number of Dealers and availability of parts almost anywhere. If the Hilux had a higher towing capacity or the L/C dual cab some more creature comforts I would have gone that way. My closest alternate Ford Dealers are Alice springs and Mt Isa.Ranger and BT 50 apparently were simple fixes once they got to the dealers.
I don't get the comments above saying the Hilux is more expensive than the Ranger. Currently in my research the SR5 Hilux is cheaper than the XLT Ranger and the Ranger is a higher specced vehicle...